

t0ggles and Jira are both project management tools, but they take very different approaches. Jira is a long-established platform known for its powerful issue tracking and extensive features, while t0ggles is a modern tool built to simplify project management without sacrificing power. In this comprehensive comparison, we'll explore their features, usability, pricing, and more to see how they stack up.
Jira - Developed by Atlassian, Jira has been a leading project and issue tracker for software teams for nearly two decades. It offers a wealth of features for agile development (scrum boards, backlogs, sprints, etc.) and is highly customizable to fit complex workflows. Jira is used by over 150,000 companies worldwide, making it a proven solution for large and small teams alike. Its strength lies in flexibility and a rich ecosystem of plugins and integrations.
t0ggles - Launched in 2024, t0ggles was designed to address common pain points in traditional project management software. Unlike tools that silo projects into separate boards, t0ggles allows managing multiple projects on a single board. This multi-project paradigm reflects modern workflows where tasks across different projects often intersect. Since launch, t0ggles has rapidly evolved to include task dependencies, board reports, automations, a public API, and integrations with Zapier, Google Calendar, GitHub, and Figma. The platform delivers enterprise-grade features in a fast, intuitive package.
Both Jira and t0ggles offer robust features for managing projects and tasks, but there are key differences in their capabilities and approach.
| Aspect | t0ggles | Jira Software (Cloud) |
|---|---|---|
| Project Management Style | Multiple projects on same board - great for cross-project visibility | One project per board by default - multiple boards needed for many projects |
| Ease of Use | Intuitive UI with minimal setup. Little to no learning curve | Powerful but complex. Often requires training or a dedicated admin |
| Task Dependencies | Built-in with lag days, circular dependency detection, and visual indicators | Available but requires configuration. Advanced features need Premium tier |
| Reporting | Built-in burndown, workload, dependency health reports. CSV/PDF export included | Extensive reporting with dozens of built-in options. Some require Premium |
| Automations | Built-in rule-based automations on all plans | Powerful automation engine. Limited rules on free/Standard, more on Premium |
| Change History | Full audit trail included on all plans | Available, more detailed history on Premium tier |
| Customization | Custom fields, tags, statuses. Works well out-of-the-box | Highly customizable workflows, issue types, fields. Requires configuration time |
| Performance | Fast and lightweight, even with many tasks | Feature-rich but can be slower with larger datasets or complex projects |
| Built-in Features | All-in-one: tasks, subtasks, notes/docs, calendar, Gantt, reports, automations, dependencies | Rich dev-oriented features. Docs require Confluence. Some features need add-ons |
| Integrations | Zapier (5,000+ apps), Google Calendar, GitHub, Figma, Public API, MCP Server | Extensive marketplace (3,000+ apps). Most integrations via add-ons |
| AI Features | Native AI task creation and writing assistant | Available via third-party plugins |
| Guest Users | Built-in guest access for external collaborators | Available on paid plans with user limits |
| Ideal Use Cases | Teams wanting a modern, fast PM tool to manage multiple projects together. Great for startups, agencies, and teams frustrated by complex tools | Large organizations needing highly customizable workflows. Teams invested in the Atlassian ecosystem |
One of the biggest differences between t0ggles and Jira is the user experience.
Jira's interface, while recently modernized, is still quite dense. New users often face a steep learning curve due to the sheer number of options and settings. Navigating between projects, configuring workflows, and managing filters or permissions can feel overwhelming. It's not uncommon for companies to have a dedicated Jira administrator to manage the tool.
t0ggles emphasizes a clean and intuitive UI/UX. The design is uncluttered, focusing on the work items themselves. On a t0ggles board you see cards for tasks organized by project or status, without an excess of menus or required fields. Everything needed is accessible but not intrusive.
Performance also plays into usability. t0ggles has been highlighted for its speed and efficiency - actions like updating tasks or switching views happen near-instantly. Jira - especially cloud-hosted instances - can sometimes suffer from slower load times, particularly in large projects or when using many add-ons.
t0ggles simplifies the mental model of project management. By allowing multiple projects in one space, users don't have to constantly think about which project's board they need to check. Jira can show multiple projects in one board via complex filters, but it requires setup. t0ggles provides this capability by default.

t0ggles's multi-project board interface. Multiple projects (e.g., "UI Design", "Backend", "Mobile App") are visible on one screen. This unified view gives complete oversight of various workstreams without switching contexts.
When it comes to onboarding: a non-technical team member can start using t0ggles with minimal instruction - creating tasks, dragging them across columns, and adding notes is straightforward. With Jira, new users might struggle with concepts like issue types, JQL (Jira Query Language), or the difference between company-managed vs. team-managed projects. t0ggles lowers the barrier to entry for team collaboration.
Pricing is another area where the two tools diverge significantly.
t0ggles Pricing: The platform offers one flat plan: $5 per user per month (billed annually). This single plan includes unlimited projects, boards, tasks, notes, and all features - including dependencies, reports, automations, integrations, and API access. There are no feature-based tiers. After a 14-day free trial, every active user incurs that subscription cost. At $5/user, t0ggles is competitively priced and includes features that competitors charge extra for.
Jira Pricing: Jira offers a freemium model. The Free plan supports up to 10 users at no cost, though it has limitations (2GB storage, community support only, limited automations, no advanced features). The Standard plan costs about $7.50 per user/month. The Premium plan with advanced features (Advanced Roadmaps, unlimited automations, more storage) is about $13.50 per user/month.
Jira's cost can grow when you incorporate other Atlassian products. Many teams pair Jira with Confluence (documentation) at $5-$10 per user/month. If you need Jira Service Management, that's another cost. Getting the full suite of project management capabilities in Jira often requires paying for several products.
| Plan / Cost | t0ggles | Jira (Cloud) |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | No free plan (14-day trial) | Yes, free for up to 10 users (limited features) |
| Paid Plans | $5/user/month - all features included | Standard: ~$7.50/user; Premium: ~$13.50/user |
| Dependencies | Included | Standard tier (basic), Premium for advanced |
| Reports | Included | Included, some advanced reports Premium only |
| Automations | Unlimited, included | Limited on Free/Standard, unlimited on Premium |
| API Access | Included | Included |
| Documentation | Built-in Notes, included | Requires Confluence ($5-$10/user extra) |
For a team of 15 users, t0ggles costs $75/month total with all features. Jira Standard would be about $112.5/month, and you'd need Confluence for docs. The gap widens when you need Premium features.
t0ggles - Pros:
t0ggles - Cons:
Jira - Pros:
Jira - Cons:
Jira and t0ggles cater to different philosophies of project management. Jira brings a heavyweight, all-encompassing platform that can be bent to almost any purpose - if you have the time and expertise to configure it. t0ggles offers a modern approach that prioritizes ease-of-use and a unified experience while still delivering powerful features.
If your team is frustrated with Jira's complexity, or if you want enterprise-grade features without enterprise-grade setup time, t0ggles is worth serious consideration. It covers dependencies, reports, automations, and integrations - features that put it on par with Jira's Premium tier - at a fraction of the complexity and cost. The ability to see multiple projects at once, combined with snappy performance and modern design, boosts productivity without the learning curve.
If you require highly specialized workflows, have a large IT organization with dedicated Jira admins, or your company is deeply invested in the Atlassian ecosystem (Confluence, Bitbucket, etc.), Jira remains a solid choice. It's an industry standard for a reason.
For teams that want to manage projects effectively without fighting their tools, t0ggles offers a compelling alternative. It delivers the features modern teams need - dependencies, automations, reports, integrations, AI assistance - in a fast, intuitive package. The development team continues to ship new capabilities regularly, and the platform has matured significantly since launch.
t0ggles is the better choice for teams seeking a modern project management experience that keeps everyone aligned and productive, without the steep learning curve or complex pricing.
Looking for a Jira alternative? See how t0ggles works for your team:
If you're comparing other options, see how t0ggles stacks up against GitHub Projects, Linear, Todoist, Wrike, and Monday.com.
Get updates, design tips, and sneak peeks at upcoming features delivered straight to your inbox.