t0ggles vs Linear: Complete Project Management for Every Team
Choosing project management software shapes how your team plans, executes, and delivers work. In this comparison, we examine t0ggles and Linear, two modern tools built for speed and simplicity. Linear has earned praise among engineering teams for its sleek interface and keyboard-first design, while t0ggles offers a comprehensive project management platform with AI capabilities, multi-project boards, and public collaboration features. We'll compare these tools across ease of use, AI and automation, task dependencies, multi-project management, reporting, pricing, integrations, and public features to help you choose the right fit.
#Ease Of Use
Both t0ggles and Linear prioritize clean, fast interfaces that stay out of your way. t0ggles delivers a modern UI with customizable task card layouts, status colors, and multiple views including Kanban/Columns, List, Calendar, and Gantt Chart. Interactive demo boards help new users explore features hands-on, and the 14-day free trial gives teams time to evaluate without commitment.
Linear is renowned for its keyboard-first, developer-centric design. Commands feel instant, and power users appreciate extensive keyboard shortcuts for nearly every action. However, Linear's opinionated approach means less flexibility in how you view and organize work. The interface is optimized for engineering issue tracking rather than general project management, which can feel limiting for non-technical teams or varied workflows.
For teams wanting a versatile tool that adapts to different work styles while maintaining speed, t0ggles offers more flexibility without sacrificing the modern experience.
Ease Of Use Comparison:
| Aspect | t0ggles | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| User Interface | Clean, modern design with customizable layouts | Sleek, minimalist, keyboard-first design |
| View Options | Kanban, List, Calendar, Gantt Chart | List, Board, Timeline |
| Learning Curve | Minimal - demo boards guide onboarding | Low for devs, steeper for non-technical users |
| Customization | Flexible card layouts, status colors, views | Opinionated - less customization by design |
| Target Users | All team types - versatile | Primarily engineering and product teams |
Verdict: Linear excels for developer-focused workflows; t0ggles wins for teams needing versatility and multiple view options.
#AI Features And Automations
AI capabilities are transforming how teams manage work. t0ggles includes AI-Driven Task Creation that converts natural language into structured tasks with dates, tags, and assignees. The AI Text Editor Assistant helps refine, translate, and summarize content directly within task descriptions. Board Automations trigger actions on status changes, due dates, or task creation - automatically assigning work, updating fields, or sending notifications.
Linear offers AI features through what they call Product Intelligence - background automation that suggests assignees, teams, labels, and projects based on historical patterns. Their Triage Intelligence helps categorize incoming issues automatically. Linear also provides semantic search across titles, descriptions, and customer feedback, plus AI-generated daily and weekly summaries. However, these advanced AI features are limited to Business and Enterprise plans ($12+ per user per month).
t0ggles includes all AI capabilities in its single $5/user/month plan, while Linear gates advanced automation behind higher tiers.
AI & Automation Comparison:
| Feature | t0ggles | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| AI Task Creation | Yes - natural language to structured tasks | Limited - Triage Intelligence suggests metadata |
| AI Text Assistance | Yes - refine, translate, summarize text | No - AI focused on categorization |
| Board Automations | Yes - unlimited, status-triggered actions | Yes - GitHub-based automations primarily |
| AI Plan Availability | All features included in $5/user plan | Business ($12/user) or higher required |
| Semantic Search | Quick search with fuzzy matching | Yes - AI-powered across all content |
Verdict: t0ggles leads with comprehensive AI for content creation and task management at lower cost.
#Task Dependencies
Complex projects require understanding how tasks relate to each other. t0ggles provides full predecessor/successor dependency management with lag days for configurable buffer time between tasks. Automatic circular dependency detection prevents impossible schedules. Dependencies display as visual lines in the Gantt view, making project flow immediately clear.
Linear approaches dependencies differently. Their Roadmap Timeline shows projects over time with draggable bars for adjusting schedules. You can see when team members will free up for new work and spot projects falling behind. However, Linear's timeline operates at the project level rather than task level, meaning you cannot create dependencies between individual issues. For detailed task-level dependency management, teams often need third-party tools like linear-gantt or must export data for external analysis.
For teams managing complex projects with interconnected tasks, t0ggles offers significantly more granular dependency control.
Task Dependencies Comparison:
| Feature | t0ggles | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Predecessor/Successor | Yes - full task-level dependency chains | Project-level only - no task dependencies |
| Lag Days | Yes - configurable buffer time | No - timeline shows project duration only |
| Cycle Detection | Yes - automatic prevention | No - N/A without task dependencies |
| Gantt Visualization | Yes - task dependency lines on timeline | Timeline view - projects only, not tasks |
| Granularity | Task-level dependencies | Project-level scheduling |
Verdict: t0ggles wins decisively with complete task-level dependency management that Linear lacks.
#Multi-Project Management
Organizing multiple projects without losing context is essential for growing teams. t0ggles excels with multiple projects on one board, color-coded for instant identification. Project Focus Mode lets you zoom into a single project's Kanban board with one click, then return to the full overview. Guest Users provide limited access for external collaborators, and Project-Specific Access Control ensures team members only see relevant work.
Linear organizes work into workspaces containing teams. Each team has its own issues, and projects can span multiple teams for cross-functional work. However, this structure means switching between team contexts to see all work. Linear's Initiatives feature groups projects at a higher level but requires navigating separate views. The workspace-level Projects page shows all projects, but filtering down to your specific work requires additional setup.
Linear's team-centric structure works well for organizations with clear functional boundaries, but t0ggles' unified board approach provides simpler oversight when managing multiple concurrent projects.
Multi-Project Management Comparison:
| Feature | t0ggles | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple Projects in One View | Yes - unified board with color coding | Partial - workspace Projects page aggregates |
| Project Focus Mode | Yes - one-click zoom to single project | No - filter by project within team views |
| Guest Users | Yes - invite external collaborators | Yes - but counts toward seat limits |
| Project-Specific Access | Yes - granular permissions per project | Team-based access - projects inherit team access |
| Cross-Team Projects | N/A - single board model | Yes - projects can span multiple teams |
Verdict: t0ggles wins for intuitive multi-project visibility; Linear suits organizations with distinct team boundaries.
#Reporting And Analytics
Data-driven teams need clear insights into project health. t0ggles includes built-in reports covering burndown charts, workload distribution, and dependency health metrics. Export options include CSV and PDF for stakeholder sharing. All reports are available to every user without tier restrictions.
Linear offers Insights with real-time analytics, custom dashboards, and burn-up charts showing historical data. You can analyze issue data to spot trends and remove blockers. However, Insights features require Business or Enterprise plans. Teams on lower tiers see limited analytics and may need third-party tools like Screenful for advanced reporting including cycle times, velocity, and burndown charts.
t0ggles delivers essential project analytics to all users, while Linear reserves comprehensive reporting for higher-paying customers.
Reports & Analytics Comparison:
| Feature | t0ggles | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Burndown Charts | Yes - included in all plans | Burn-up charts on Business/Enterprise |
| Workload Reports | Yes - team task distribution | Yes - via Insights on higher plans |
| Dependency Health | Yes - track blocked tasks | No - project-level only |
| Export Options | CSV, PDF included | CSV export on Business/Enterprise |
| Custom Dashboards | Built-in reports for all | Yes - Business/Enterprise only |
| External Tools Needed | No - built-in reports sufficient | Often - for lower-tier users |
Verdict: t0ggles provides comprehensive reporting to all users without plan restrictions.
#Change History And Audit Trail
Accountability requires knowing who changed what and when. t0ggles offers full change history with field-level tracking on all task modifications. Every edit is recorded with user attribution and timestamps, providing complete visibility into task evolution.
Linear provides Audit Logs that track workspace events including account access, settings changes, and security events. Logs are retained for 90 days and can be streamed to webhooks for SIEM integration. However, Linear's audit log focuses on workspace-level events rather than detailed issue-level change tracking. For issue-specific history, you can view the activity feed within individual issues, but this is less comprehensive than field-level tracking.
For teams needing detailed task-level accountability, t0ggles provides more granular change tracking.
Change History Comparison:
| Feature | t0ggles | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Field-Level Tracking | Yes - all task changes recorded | Partial - issue activity feed |
| Who/When Details | Yes - full attribution | Yes - in activity feed and audit log |
| Data Retention | Unlimited - full history preserved | 90 days for audit logs |
| Audit Log Scope | Task-level changes | Workspace events, security, access |
| Webhook Streaming | Not applicable | Yes - SIEM integration available |
Verdict: t0ggles wins for detailed task-level change tracking; Linear excels at workspace security auditing.
#Pricing And Affordability
Pricing often determines which tools teams can realistically adopt. t0ggles offers a single plan at $5 per user per month (billed annually), including all features - AI tools, unlimited automations, dependencies, reports, integrations, and a 14-day free trial.
Linear uses a tiered pricing model. The Free plan includes unlimited members but limits you to 250 issues, 2 teams, and 10MB file uploads. Basic costs $8/user/month with unlimited issues and 5 teams. Business at $12/user/month unlocks advanced features including Insights and increased limits. Enterprise provides custom pricing with SSO, SCIM, and advanced security.
While Linear's Free plan is generous for small teams, growing organizations quickly hit limits. For full analytics and AI features, you need Business at $12/user/month - more than double t0ggles' price for comparable capabilities.
Pricing Comparison:
| Aspect | t0ggles | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | No - 14-day trial available | Yes - 250 issues, 2 teams, limited uploads |
| Entry Paid Plan | $5/user/month - all features | $8/user/month (Basic) - unlimited issues |
| Full Features Cost | $5/user/month - same price for everything | $12/user/month (Business) for Insights |
| Minimum Seats | None - pay for users you have | No minimum |
| Issue/Task Limits | Unlimited tasks included | 250 on Free, unlimited on paid |
Verdict: t0ggles delivers better value at $5/user/month with all features versus Linear's $12/user for full capabilities.
#Integrations And Ecosystem
Connecting project management to your existing stack matters for workflow efficiency. t0ggles offers:
- Zapier Integration - Connect to 5,000+ apps for automated workflows
- Google Calendar - Two-way sync keeps tasks and calendar aligned
- GitHub - Two-way sync linking commits and PRs to tasks
- Figma - Preview designs directly in task cards
- Public API - Build custom integrations
- MCP Server - AI assistants like Claude can fully manage tasks, projects, notes, and dependencies
Linear provides deep developer tool integrations including GitHub (automatic status updates when PRs open, get reviews, or merge), GitLab, Slack, Figma, Notion, and Zendesk. Linear's GitHub integration is particularly strong, keeping project boards automatically updated based on development activity. They also offer Zapier integration and a GraphQL API.
Both platforms offer solid integration ecosystems, with Linear focusing on developer workflows and t0ggles providing broader connectivity through Zapier.
Integrations Comparison:
| Aspect | t0ggles | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Integration | Yes - two-way sync for commits and PRs | Yes - automatic status updates, deep sync |
| Figma Integration | Yes - design previews in tasks | Yes - plugin for linking designs to issues |
| Zapier | Yes - 5,000+ app connections | Yes - custom automations available |
| Google Calendar Sync | Two-way sync included | Third-party tools like Morgen needed |
| Public API | Yes - full API access | Yes - GraphQL API |
| MCP Server | Yes - comprehensive AI control | Partial - via third-party AI integrations |
Verdict: Linear leads for GitHub-centric developer workflows; t0ggles offers broader integration options including Google Calendar and comprehensive MCP support.
#Public Tasks And Feedback
Transparency with external stakeholders requires public-facing features. t0ggles offers public boards that anyone can view, public task submissions where external users suggest tasks for an approval queue, public reactions (thumbs up, heart, star, fire) for feedback, and custom domains to host roadmaps at roadmap.yourcompany.com.
Linear does not natively support public boards or task submissions. Teams needing public roadmaps must use third-party tools like SteelSync, Lindie, or Featurebase to transform Linear data into shareable views. These tools add cost and complexity, requiring separate subscriptions and configuration.
For open-source projects, client-facing roadmaps, or community-driven development, t0ggles' built-in public features eliminate the need for external tools.
Public Collaboration Comparison:
| Feature | t0ggles | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Public Boards | Yes - real-time public visibility | No - requires third-party tools |
| Task Submissions | Yes - external users can suggest tasks | No - third-party tools like SteelSync needed |
| Public Reactions | Yes - multiple reaction types | No - internal reactions only |
| Custom Domains | Yes - roadmap.yourcompany.com | No - third-party hosting required |
| Native Support | Built-in features | Requires SteelSync, Lindie, or similar |
Verdict: t0ggles dominates with native public collaboration features that Linear only achieves through external tools.
#Conclusion
t0ggles and Linear both deliver fast, modern project management experiences, but they serve different needs. Linear excels as an engineering-focused issue tracker with outstanding keyboard shortcuts, deep GitHub integration, and a beautiful minimalist interface. Development teams who live in code editors will appreciate Linear's opinionated workflow. However, Linear lacks task-level dependencies, native public boards, and gates advanced features behind higher-priced tiers.
t0ggles at $5 per user per month provides a complete project management platform with:
- AI-powered task creation and text assistance included
- Unlimited board automations without action limits
- Full task dependencies with lag days and cycle detection
- Multiple views including Kanban, List, Calendar, and Gantt Chart
- Built-in reports with burndown, workload, and dependency health
- Complete change history without retention limits
- Zapier, Google Calendar, GitHub, and Figma integrations
- Comprehensive MCP Server for AI assistant control
- Guest users and project-specific access control
- Native public boards with task submissions, reactions, and custom domains
- 14-day free trial to explore everything
For teams wanting versatile project management beyond issue tracking, t0ggles delivers more value. It's an excellent choice for startups, agencies, remote teams, and product teams managing complex projects with dependencies and external stakeholders. Linear remains a strong option for pure engineering teams who prioritize speed and developer experience over comprehensive project management features.
If you're exploring alternatives, see how t0ggles compares to GitHub Projects, Jira, Hive, Trello, and Asana.
#Who Is This For?
Looking for a Linear alternative with broader capabilities? See how t0ggles works for your team:
- t0ggles for Developers - GitHub integration with task dependencies
- t0ggles for Startups - Full project management at startup pricing
- t0ggles for Product Managers - Beyond issue tracking to roadmaps
- t0ggles for SaaS Teams - Ship features with public roadmaps
Don't Miss What's Next
Get updates, design tips, and sneak peeks at upcoming features delivered straight to your inbox.