t0ggles vs Fizzy: Feature-Rich Project Management vs Minimalist Kanban

t0ggles and Fizzy represent two different philosophies in project management software. Fizzy positions itself as a stripped-down Kanban alternative that removes features rather than adding them, while t0ggles delivers a modern, feature-complete platform with AI-powered task creation, task dependencies, board automations, and comprehensive reporting. This comparison examines t0ggles vs Fizzy across key areas to help you determine which tool better fits your team's project management needs.

We'll compare both platforms on Ease of Use, AI Features & Automations, Task Dependencies, Multi-Project Management, Reporting & Analytics, Change History, Pricing & Affordability, Integrations & Ecosystem, and Public Tasks & Feedback.

#Ease Of Use

Both t0ggles and Fizzy prioritize clean interfaces, but they interpret simplicity differently. Fizzy takes a minimalist approach - it's a straightforward Kanban board that intentionally omits features the creators consider unnecessary. This makes it extremely quick to learn for basic task tracking. However, this simplicity becomes a limitation when your project management needs grow beyond simple card shuffling.

t0ggles delivers an equally intuitive experience with a modern, customizable interface. New users can jump in immediately with interactive demo boards that showcase features in context. The key difference is that t0ggles scales with your needs - you start simple, but advanced features like multiple view modes (Kanban, List, Calendar, Gantt Chart), custom task layouts, and status colors are available when you need them.

Fizzy's interface is fast and responsive, which it emphasizes as a selling point. t0ggles matches this performance while offering significantly more functionality. Where Fizzy gives you one way to view your work (Kanban boards), t0ggles lets you switch between four different views based on how you prefer to see your tasks and timelines.

Ease Of Use Comparison:

Aspect	t0ggles	Fizzy
User Interface	Clean, modern UI with customizable card layouts, status colors, and multiple viewing options.	Minimalist Kanban interface. Fast but limited customization options.
Learning Curve	Minimal - intuitive for beginners with demo boards for guided exploration. Scales to advanced features.	Very minimal - basic Kanban that most users grasp instantly. Limited features to learn.
Onboarding	14-day free trial with sample projects and import tools from other platforms.	Free tier available. Simple signup but no guided onboarding or import tools.
Multiple Views	Four view modes: Columns/Kanban, List, Calendar, and Gantt Chart.	Single view: Kanban boards only.
Customization	Extensive - task layouts, custom properties, status colors, workflow configuration.	Basic - standard Kanban cards with stamps showing creator and date.

Verdict: t0ggles wins because it matches Fizzy's simplicity for basic use while providing depth for teams that need to grow beyond simple Kanban boards.

#AI Features And Automations

This is where t0ggles and Fizzy diverge dramatically. Fizzy explicitly rejects AI features, stating they "didn't add artificial intelligence" to their product. While this appeals to users who distrust AI or want the absolute simplest tool, it means Fizzy offers no intelligent assistance for task management.

t0ggles embraces AI as a productivity multiplier. The AI-Driven Task Creation feature lets you describe tasks in natural language and have the system generate structured task cards with due dates, tags, and assignees automatically. Type "Prepare quarterly report and send to stakeholders by Friday" and t0ggles creates a properly formatted task with all the details filled in. This saves significant time when creating multiple tasks or processing requirements.

Beyond task creation, t0ggles includes an AI Text Editor Assistant that can translate, refine, or summarize text within task descriptions and notes. For international teams or anyone who wants polished documentation, this is invaluable.

t0ggles also offers Board Automations - rule-based workflows that trigger actions automatically. Set up automations to assign tasks when status changes, update due dates, add tags, or notify team members. Fizzy has no automation capabilities whatsoever; every action must be performed manually.

For AI assistant integration, t0ggles provides an MCP Server that allows AI tools like Claude to directly interact with your boards, creating and managing tasks programmatically.

AI And Automations Comparison:

Feature	t0ggles	Fizzy
AI Task Creation	Yes - Natural language creates structured tasks with dates, tags, and assignees.	No - Explicitly does not include AI features.
AI Text Assistant	Yes - Built-in AI for translating, refining, and enhancing task descriptions.	No - No AI text assistance.
Board Automations	Yes - Rule-based workflows for auto-assignment, status changes, notifications, and field updates.	No - No automation features. All actions are manual.
MCP Server Integration	Yes - AI assistants can interact with boards directly via API.	No - No AI integration capabilities.

Verdict: t0ggles wins decisively with comprehensive AI and automation features that save time and reduce manual work, while Fizzy offers none.

#Task Dependencies

Task dependencies are critical for managing projects where certain tasks must complete before others can begin. Software development, product launches, and marketing campaigns all require understanding which tasks block others.

t0ggles provides native task dependencies with full predecessor/successor relationships. You can define which tasks must complete first, set lag days (buffer time between dependent tasks), and the system automatically detects circular dependencies to prevent workflow loops. In Gantt Chart view, dependency lines visualize the critical path through your project.

Fizzy has no task dependency features. Cards exist independently with no way to link them or establish sequencing. For projects with interconnected deliverables, this is a significant limitation that forces teams to track dependencies manually or use external tools.

Task Dependencies Comparison:

Feature	t0ggles	Fizzy
Native Dependencies	Yes - Built-in predecessor/successor relationships for all tasks.	No - Cards are independent with no linking.
Lag Days	Yes - Set buffer time between dependent tasks.	No - Not available.
Circular Detection	Yes - Automatic detection prevents dependency loops.	N/A - No dependencies to detect.
Visual Dependencies	Yes - Dependency lines visible in Gantt Chart view.	No - Kanban only, no Gantt view.
Critical Path	Yes - Identify task sequences that determine project timeline.	No - No dependency analysis.

Verdict: t0ggles wins with comprehensive dependency management. Fizzy offers no dependency features at all.

#Multi-Project Management

When managing multiple projects simultaneously, t0ggles was built specifically for this challenge. Fizzy takes a traditional approach where each board represents a separate project, requiring you to switch between boards constantly when working across multiple workstreams.

t0ggles offers Multiple Projects on Same Board functionality. Manage all your ventures on one unified board with complete oversight. Each task belongs to a project, and you can view tasks from all projects together or use Focus Mode to filter down to a single project's tasks instantly. This eliminates the context-switching that slows down multi-project work.

t0ggles also provides Guest Users with limited access for external collaborators (clients, contractors, stakeholders) and Project-Specific Access Control to restrict team members to specific projects within a board. This is essential for agencies managing multiple clients or teams with confidential workstreams.

Fizzy offers none of these capabilities. There's no way to manage multiple projects on one board, no focus mode, and no granular access control beyond basic board membership.

Multi-Project Management Comparison:

Feature	t0ggles	Fizzy
Multiple Projects In One View	Yes - Handle multiple projects on one board with color-coding.	No - Each board is a separate project.
Focus Mode	Yes - One-click filter to single project's tasks.	No - Must switch between boards.
Guest Users	Yes - Invite external users with controlled access.	Limited - Basic user access to boards.
Project-Specific Access	Yes - Restrict team members to specific projects.	No - No project-level access control.
Limits	Unlimited projects and boards.	Free tier limited to 1,000 total cards (including deleted).

Verdict: t0ggles wins for teams managing multiple projects with its unified board view, Focus Mode, and granular access controls.

#Reporting And Analytics

Reporting and analytics help teams understand progress, identify bottlenecks, and make data-driven decisions. This is another area where the tools differ significantly.

t0ggles includes built-in reporting with no additional tools required:

• Board Reports showing task distribution and completion rates
• Workload Analysis to see task distribution across team members
• Dependency Health to identify blocked tasks and bottlenecks
• Export options to CSV and PDF for stakeholder presentations

Fizzy has no reporting or analytics features. The only insight you get is looking at your Kanban board. There are no charts, no metrics, no way to export data for analysis. Teams needing visibility into project health must track everything manually or use external tools.

Reporting And Analytics Comparison:

Feature	t0ggles	Fizzy
Native Reports	Yes - Built-in reports for task distribution, completion, workload.	No - No reporting features.
Workload Analysis	Yes - See task distribution per team member.	No - No workload visibility.
Dependency Reports	Yes - Track blocked tasks and dependency health.	N/A - No dependencies to report on.
Export to CSV/PDF	Yes - Export reports for stakeholders.	No - No export functionality.

Verdict: t0ggles wins with comprehensive built-in reporting. Fizzy offers no analytics capabilities.

#Change History And Audit Trail

Change history provides transparency and accountability - essential for teams that need to track modifications and understand how tasks evolved.

t0ggles includes full change history for all tasks with field-level tracking. See every modification: status changes, assignment updates, due date shifts, description edits - all attributed to the user who made the change with timestamps. This is invaluable for audits, client accountability, and understanding how work progressed.

Fizzy offers Stamps that show who created a card and when, plus basic notifications when changes occur. However, there's no comprehensive history or audit trail showing the evolution of a task over time. The "information bubbling" feature highlights ignored cards, but this isn't the same as tracking actual changes.

Change History Comparison:

Feature	t0ggles	Fizzy
Full Change History	Yes - Complete audit trail for all task modifications.	No - Only creation stamps, no change history.
Who Changed What	Yes - Every change attributed to the user who made it.	Limited - Shows creator only.
Field-Level Tracking	Yes - Track changes to specific fields (status, due date, etc.).	No - No field-level tracking.
Historical Timeline	Yes - See complete evolution from creation to completion.	No - Basic creation info only.

Verdict: t0ggles wins with comprehensive change tracking for full accountability.

#Pricing And Affordability

Both t0ggles and Fizzy position themselves as affordable alternatives to bloated enterprise tools, but their pricing models differ.

t0ggles Pricing: One simple plan at $5 per user per month (billed annually). This includes all features - unlimited projects, boards, tasks, AI features, dependencies, reporting, automations, integrations, and storage. A 14-day free trial lets you evaluate fully before committing. No hidden costs, no feature tiers. See complete details on our pricing page.

Fizzy Pricing: Free tier allows tracking up to 1,000 cards with 1GB storage. The paid plan is $20/month (flat rate, not per-user) for unlimited cards and users with 5GB storage. Important caveat: deleted cards still count toward the 1,000 card limit on free tier.

At first glance, Fizzy's flat $20/month might seem attractive for large teams. However, consider what you're getting: Fizzy is a basic Kanban board with no AI, no dependencies, no reporting, no automations, and limited integrations. For a team of 4 users, t0ggles costs $20/month and delivers vastly more functionality.

Pricing Comparison:

Aspect	t0ggles	Fizzy
Free Plan	No free plan. 14-day free trial.	Yes - 1,000 cards max (including deleted), 1GB storage.
Paid Plan	$5/user/month - ALL features included.	$20/month flat - unlimited cards/users, 5GB storage.
Break-Even Point	4 users = $20/month.	Any team size = $20/month.
Features Included	AI, dependencies, reporting, automations, all integrations, unlimited storage.	Basic Kanban boards only. Webhooks included.
Storage	Unlimited on paid plan.	5GB on paid plan. Additional 50GB increments available (extra cost).

Verdict: t0ggles offers significantly more value. While Fizzy's flat pricing benefits very large teams on paper, the feature gap means you're paying for a much simpler tool. For most teams, t0ggles delivers better ROI.

#Integrations And Ecosystem

Integration with other tools extends the value of your project management platform. Here's how t0ggles and Fizzy compare.

t0ggles provides a focused set of powerful integrations:

• Zapier Integration: Connect to 5,000+ apps for automated workflows
• Google Calendar Integration: Two-way sync between tasks and calendar
• GitHub Integration: Two-way sync linking commits and PRs to tasks
• Figma Integration: Embed design previews directly in tasks
• Public API: Build custom integrations and automations
• MCP Server: Unique AI assistant integration (Claude, etc.)

Fizzy offers minimal integration capabilities:

• Webhooks: Publish events to Slack or Campfire
• API: Available for custom development
• No native integrations with Basecamp, GitHub, or Jira
• No data import tools from other services

Fizzy explicitly states they don't provide import tools from other services, which makes migration difficult.

Integrations Comparison:

Integration	t0ggles	Fizzy
Zapier	Yes - Native integration with 5,000+ apps.	No - Webhooks only.
Google Calendar	Yes - Two-way sync.	No - Not available.
GitHub	Yes - Two-way sync for commits/PRs.	No - Not available.
Figma	Yes - Design previews in tasks.	No - Not available.
Public API	Yes - Full API for custom integrations.	Yes - API available.
MCP Server (AI)	Yes - AI assistants can manage boards directly.	No - Not available.
Data Import	Yes - Import from Trello, Jira, and other platforms.	No - No import tools provided.

Verdict: t0ggles wins with comprehensive integrations including Zapier for broad connectivity, while Fizzy offers only basic webhooks and API.

#Public Tasks And Feedback

Modern teams often need to share progress publicly with stakeholders, users, or communities. This is another area where t0ggles provides significantly more capability.

t0ggles supports full public engagement:

• Public Boards: Make project boards visible to anyone
• Public Task Submissions: External users can suggest tasks via built-in form, with submissions going to approval queue
• Public Reactions: External users can react to tasks (thumbs up, heart, star, fire) to indicate interest
• Custom Domains: Host your public board on your own domain (e.g., roadmap.yourcompany.com)

Fizzy offers basic public board sharing but limited interaction capabilities. External users can view public boards but cannot submit tasks or interact beyond viewing. There's no custom domain support for branded public boards.

Public Collaboration Comparison:

Feature	t0ggles	Fizzy
Public Board Visibility	Yes - Boards can be made public for anyone to view.	Yes - Public boards available.
External Task Submission	Yes - Built-in form for public task suggestions with approval queue.	No - External users cannot submit cards.
Public Reactions/Voting	Yes - External users can react to show interest in tasks.	No - View only.
Custom Domains	Yes - Host public boards on your own domain.	No - Uses Fizzy URLs only.

Verdict: t0ggles wins for teams wanting to engage communities or stakeholders with public roadmaps and feedback collection.

#Conclusion

t0ggles and Fizzy serve different audiences with fundamentally different philosophies. Fizzy deliberately minimizes features, positioning itself as an anti-complexity tool for teams that want nothing more than basic Kanban boards. This approach works for simple task tracking, but becomes limiting as projects grow in complexity.

t0ggles represents modern project management with a complete feature set:

• AI-powered task creation from natural language - Fizzy has no AI
• Native task dependencies with lag days and critical path - Fizzy has none
• Board automations that eliminate repetitive work - Fizzy is entirely manual
• Built-in reporting for workload and project health - Fizzy has no analytics
• Multi-project boards with Focus Mode - Fizzy silos projects
• Full change history for accountability - Fizzy has basic stamps only
• Comprehensive integrations including Zapier, Google Calendar, GitHub, and unique MCP Server
• Public boards with task submissions and custom domains - Fizzy has view-only sharing

All this comes at $5/user/month - competitive with Fizzy's flat $20/month for teams of 4+ users, but delivering exponentially more capability.

For individuals or tiny teams with the simplest possible Kanban needs, Fizzy's minimalist approach might suffice. For growing teams, agencies, startups, developers, or anyone who needs project management that scales, t0ggles is the clear choice in the t0ggles vs Fizzy comparison. You get the simplicity you need to start quickly, plus the depth required as your projects and team evolve.

If you're comparing other options, see how t0ggles stacks up against Trello, Todoist, GitHub Projects, Notion, and Monday.com.